Somehow I figured the first side I read that brought Nazis — or, in this case, Holocaust denial — into the Intelligent Design debate would be the ID proponents, not the opponents. Guess I was naive.
Oh well, Godwin’s law wouldn’t exist if Nazi analogies weren’t useful across the political spectrum.
And, by the way, darn those “techniques of rhetoric and debate”. If we just didn’t have those, we’d be in a much better…Oh wait, he doesn’t say what those are, does he? 😉
Update: In the comments, Mark Nutter points out some prior art that confirms my original impression. Thanks, Mark!